Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: ACI 117[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: ACI 117
- From: GSKWY(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:47:35 EST
You are correct -the SUBJ: of the thread is ACI 117, which I guess I should know since I was the one that started it to comment on the fact that ACI 117 was not a well written document. I also commented that ACI 301 was not a well written document and was frequently misused.
A discussion of how an engineer incorrectly claimed that ACI 301 required the contractor test the concrete certainly seemed a locigal extension of the original post. But apparently not, I guess I should have started a new thread with the SUBJ: "Incompetent Engineers".
It's not entirely clear to me why you think people around the world are interested in your whining about how everyone ignores you, but heck, if it makes you feel good, go at it. It's no worse than your political commentary.
Some people would chose to spend their time doing something about a problem rather than whining about it, but that's just some people.
In a message dated 2/9/2005 9:23:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, bill(--nospam--at)polhemus.cc writes:
> Unless I completely lost track of the thread, there was no discussion
- Re: ACI 117
- From: Gary Hodgson & Associates
- Re: ACI 117
- Prev by Subject: Re: ACI 117
- Next by Subject: Re: ACI 117
- Previous by thread: Re: ACI 117
- Next by thread: Re: ACI 117