Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: 2002 aisc seismic provisions

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

On Mar 10, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Jake Watson wrote:

P.S. I have had many discussions about this matter and freely admit my opinions are in the minority.
I've done a little seismic work over the past 20 years, and you sound pretty much right on to me. I was brought up (professionally) with the notion that structural steel is inherently ductile, but it's only ductile to the extent that the designer can avoid a lot of behaviors that aren't ductile. every time I hear people talk about 'pre-qualified' joints, my palms sweat a little.

As I said, we don’t understand dynamic loading half as well as we pretend.
Too, too true, and I can say this because I know something about structural dynamics.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com   | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********