Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Road Repair Advice Needed[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Road Repair Advice Needed
- From: "Dennis S. Wish, PE" <dennis.wish(--nospam--at)verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:04:14 -0800
I have a client who is purchasing two lots for two custom homes in the
foothills of a mountain overlooking a golf course in Palm Springs.
There is an old road about 300 feet long that makes the climb to the
property; one side of the road is a rock hillside cut for the road
years ago. The other side that is seen from below is simply stacked
stone slabs retaining soil. The maximum height of the unsupported
roadway (or that which is supported by the gravity wall of stacked
stone slabs) was determined by the geotechnical engineer to be
insufficient for heavy utility vehicles such as a fire truck that must
be allowed access to the lots above. |
I have not seen the road but the City is adamant about keeping the appearance of the stone wall. I discussed some choices with soil engineer but will not have any design values until sometime next week. His thoughts followed mine, but these seem rather expensive solutions for access to the two custom home lots:
1. Install Soldier Piles behind the existing stacked rock that would need to be drilled at the most, ten feet into bedrock and would be tied by one or more beams that would help retain and support the roadway. The potential down side is that the coring of the soldier piles may "blow out" the stone wall in which case it would need to be repaired.
2. design a retaining wall behind the existing stone wall that sets on embedded piles and grade beams and then work some veneer ties into the stacked stone. Again, the piles would be about ten feet deep into bedrock at this time and the wall would need to transfer rotation to the grade beam and top of piles.
3. Trench behind the existing stacked stone and shore sufficiently to allow a conventional "L" shaped retaining wall to be constructed, backfill and compact. This would avoid the need to core piles but would require the removal of more soil to allow the design of a more conventional wall with an adjacent surcharge for the road and heavy trucks. The stone would be veneered tied if possible and the face of the new wall would be constructed close enough to flow in a grout or mortar to help tie the stone to the wall.
The owner prefers number 3 above as the soldier piles would be very expensive for a 300-foot stretch of road.
There must be some other ideas out there. I thought we might be able to work in a corrugated sheet "pile" idea and then tie it back to the hillside bedrock using rock anchors.
Can anyone give me some ideas to search out that might help me make an intelligent choice as to the most economical solution to the problem?
Dennis S. Wish, PE
Dennis S. Wish, PE
California Professional Engineer
Structural Engineering Consultant
760.564.0884 (office - fax)
This e-mail is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential and proprietary. If this information is received by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the sender by e-mail and promptly delete the transmitted material from your computer and server. In no event shall this material be read, used, stored, or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s) without the express written consent of the sender or the named addressee(s).
- Prev by Subject: Return Receipt Emails WAS Re: ACI 318-2002 Creep, Shrinkage
- Next by Subject: RE: Road Repair Advice Needed
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding nail values to bolt values
- Next by thread: RE: Road Repair Advice Needed