Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: California Building Code

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I think he was referring to outside of California
-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Brock [mailto:gil(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:47 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: California Building Code
Importance: High


I did not realize that all countries outside the USA were uncivilized!!!

At 03:27 AM 24/03/2005, you wrote:
We are finally joining the rest of civilized world. It will be a leap frog going from 97 UBC to 06 IBC, but it works out well since the ASCE-7-05 will be a much better document to use for seismic design than the ASCE-7-02. I personally can't wait, since IBC is also a much better code to use for non-structural provisions such as fire safety and egress.
Good riddance NFPA!
Ben Yousefi, SE
Santa Monica, CA

From: Paul Feather [ mailto:pfeather(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:55 AM
To: SEAOC List
Subject: California Building Code
Well, it is now official, California has reversed the decision to adopt the NFPA code and will be adopting the ICC codes.  The press statement was not specific on a time line, though a two year period was mentioned as the normal legislative cycle.  Based on this we in CA would finally see adoption of a new building code in 2007. 
Paul Feather PE, SE

Regards  Gil Brock
Prestressed Concrete Design Consultants Pty. Ltd. (ABN 84 003 163 586)
5 Cameron Street Beenleigh Qld 4207 Australia
Ph +61 7 3807 8022               Fax +61 7 3807 8422
email:            gil(--nospam--at)
email:            sales(--nospam--at)
email:            support(--nospam--at)