Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: IBC2000 versus IBC2003[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: IBC2000 versus IBC2003
- From: "Stuart, Matthew" <mstuart(--nospam--at)schoordepalma.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:18:49 -0500
If the building is permitted after the Code change then the structure must be designed for the latest adopted Code and not the one that was in effect during the actual design process.
D. Matthew Stuart, P.E., S.E.
200 State Highway Nine
Manalapan, NJ 07726-0900
Phone: (732) 577-9000 (Ext. 1283)
FAX: (732) 431-9428
Cell: (908) 309-8657
Why would you want to do that? It was designed for what it was designed for!
Bill Cain, SE
In a message dated 3/30/2005 7:20:05 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, JWadsworth(--nospam--at)TricoEngineering.com writes:
I've been asked to
certify that a condominium designed in our office last
- Prev by Subject: Re: IBC2000 versus IBC2003
- Next by Subject: RE: IBC2000 versus IBC2003
- Previous by thread: Re: IBC2000 versus IBC2003
- Next by thread: RE: IBC2000 versus IBC2003