Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Business License

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Hey, we were roommates in college (david and I) so I guess all the beer
didn't screw up our memories too badly.

Good luck Paul,
-gm

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Feather [mailto:pfeather(--nospam--at)SE-Solutions.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 2:49 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Re: Business License

Thanks Gerard and David, that is exactly what I was looking for.

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Topete" <davetopete(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Business License


> Paul,
> I believe it was a post from Dennis Wish (<--  hope
> he's doing well...) from Dec. 15th.  i saved it just
> in case.  Here it is with a link to his
> structuralist.net tinyurl link to the court
> decision...:
> ----------
> I received a private e-mail about a post I referenced
> a couple of years ago when some cities attempted to
> make engineers and architects purchase a business
> license in the location where they did not have a
> physical presence. This issue surfaced again as this
> engineer is being told that he must purchase the
> "special fee license" because he performs Structural
> Observation in the city of Santa Monica. Personally, I
> think this is a last ditch effort for cities to
> overcome their financial problems by attempting to
> gain additional cash flow from the business community.
>
> The lower court decision and the appeals court
> overruling decision is posted on our Structuralist.Net
> Professional Blog! @ http://tinyurl.com/48lef .
>
> If you are having trouble over this reoccurring issue
> then I would recommend you read the appeals court
> decision in the case of City of San Jose v. Ruthroff,
> Englekirk, Etc. Engineers, Inc. 1 Cal. App.3d 462; 183
> Cal.Rptr. 391. Again, follow the "tinyurl" link above
> to the direct Blog page where the complete decision
> has been posted.
>
> If there is any justification for what Santa Monica
> and a couple of other cities that I have heard about
> are doing, please let me know and I will add a posting
> under our Professional Ethics & Law  Blog! (web log)
> on the Structuralist.Net.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> Dennis S. Wish, PE
>
> California Professional Engineer
>
> Structural Engineering Consultant
>
> dennis.wish(--nospam--at)verizon.net
> -----------
> David Topete, S.E.
> SF, CA
>
> --- Paul Feather <pfeather(--nospam--at)SE-Solutions.net> wrote:
>> A while back someone posted a Board statement or
>> Legislative statement in California regarding the
>> requirement for design professionals needing a
>> business license in each city where a project is
>> located (i.e. not needed)
>>
>> Does anyone have the reference handy?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paul Feather PE, SE
>> pfeather(--nospam--at)SE-Solutions.net
>> www.SE-Solutions.net
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
>


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********