Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Braced Timber Frames - try again

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Just to make sure I understand……the IBC does not allow a braced timber frame in seismic country, right?  That’s what I’m getting but seams that someone forgot to tell the contractors. 

 

How does one safely establish R for an undefined system?  I thought that if it wasn’t in the Code don’t do it…..

 

Chris

 

Haffner Consulting Engineering

www.haffnerconsulting.com

Office & Fax:  541-478-3052

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Haan, Scott M POA [mailto:Scott.M.Haan(--nospam--at)poa02.usace.army.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:04 AM
To:
seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Braced Timber Frames - try again

 

No.  I would find a system that had the same R in the 97 UBC and use the R that is in the IBC for that system or if your friendly building department plan reviewer does not like that logic use the R for an undefined system.

 


From: Christopher Haffner [mailto:chaffner(--nospam--at)gorge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:56 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Braced Timber Frames - try again

 

Sorry to do this again but I'm on an island until I get some feedback on this.  

 

The UBC had an R-Value of 2.8 for braced timber-frames in Table 16-O but that listing disappeared in the IBC Table

1617.6.2.  Is there any kind of Code guidance on this type of structure any more?  Is this type of SFRS even allowed anymore?  What are others doing?  It's pretty hard convincing people why a braced timber frame can no longer be used when it's "been done like that for years." 

 

Chris

 

Haffner Consulting Engineering

www.haffnerconsulting.com

Office & Fax:  541-478-3052