single angle bending members

• To: "Seaint" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
• Subject: single angle bending members
• From: "Dmitri Wright" <dmitri(--nospam--at)pciengineers.com>
• Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 10:51:28 -0700
```Joe,

```
If it is any consolation, I have designed many similar lintels. I have always assumed that the compression flanges were adequately braced by the CMU and thru-bolts that I always use. I then use the double angle strength for the system design. I wrote a spread sheet for ASD analysis of single angle members a few years ago, because the equations are so tedious. The catch is that I only wrote it for equal leg angles, and never needed to extend it to unequal legs (the equations are a lot worse). For the 4x4x1/2 angle braced by the CMU, I get a bending capacity of 3000 lb-ft. Hope this helps.
```
Dmitri Wright, PE
Portland, OR

________________________________________________________________________

From: "Joe Grill" <jgrill(--nospam--at)swiaz.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: single angle bending members

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C550C6.CE548740
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am once again (or still) pondering the question of single angle =
bending
members.  I am looking at lintels for an existing masonry wall.  I have =
used
the LRFD equations for a 4x4x1/2 angle and compared it to a 6x4x1/2 =
angle
per the LRFD.  Unless I am doing something wrong (and I might be at =
that)
the 6x4 angle has less capacity in flexure than the 4x4 angle.  It just
doesn't seem right.=20

=20

Has anyone found this to be the case?  Does anyone have a reference with =
an
example that they would like to share with me, in case I am missing
something in the LRFD manua?.  My texts don't cover this aspect.  I =
would
appreciate a fax if possible.

=20

Thanks,=20

Joe Grill

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
```
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
```*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
```
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********