RE: DRAFTING: Structural Drafting Standard[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: RE: DRAFTING: Structural Drafting Standard
- From: "Polhemus, Bill" <bill.polhemus(--nospam--at)tyson.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:10:59 -0500
From: dave lowen [mailto:jatech(--nospam--at)kwic.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:47 AM
Subject: RE: DRAFTING: Structural Drafting Standard
Your drawings are correct. The style this company is using is for mechanical drafting.
That's sorta what I thought.
In fact, one comment that one of the CAD admins made to me was "well, we have our own standards because most drafting is for buildings." This in response to my wondering why they didn't adopt the ANSI/AIA CAD Layering Standard (which I've used for some time now).
I probably won't have any effect if I grip, but it just bugs me. Such a silly think, i'n't it? That's why my comment about "getting old". I'm getting as set in my ways as--well, as all the other old f*rts on this list.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, then you have received this email in error and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of your unintended receipt by reply and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email or as a result of any additions or deletions of information originally contained in this email.
- Prev by Subject: Re: DRAFTING: Structural Drafting Standard
- Next by Subject: Drifting snow on small canopy
- Previous by thread: Re: DRAFTING: Structural Drafting Standard
- Next by thread: Hiking trail design guides?