Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: CONCRETE: Weird Spec Citation?

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Title: CONCRETE: Weird Spec Citation?
Most NCHRP books from that era are and were only available from the Department of Commerce "National Technical Information Service."  Most document had the results that the sealers were expecting.  Try this link or you can download for $8.95 at this link
It amazes me how often we specify something without even reading what we have specified. 
As to your second query, probably.  But you don't know until you get the NCHRP report.  Besides, as I recall this documented included SILANE base sealers and the test is a simple hydrophobic evaluation for a minimum depth of sealer penetration.  But then it's been at least 12 years since I read the thing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Polhemus, Bill [mailto:bill.polhemus(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 3:53 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: CONCRETE: Weird Spec Citation?

I came across a reference to "NCHRP 244" in an old concrete spec I'm editing. This wasn't familiar to me so it was to Google I went.

Interestingly, lots of manufacturers of concrete sealers reference "NCHRP 244," leading me to believe that it is used industry-wide, at least, but none of them tell you what it is.

I finally came to the conclusion that it was a reference to a book titled "Concrete Sealers for Protection of Bridge Structures" by Pfeifer and Scali, published in 1981 by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program in association with the Transportation Research Board (TRB) and the National Research Council (ISBN 0309034094).

As old as that document obviously is, and considering that it was apparently published by the taxpayers, I figured I could get a copy of it from SOMEWHERE online. I was wrong. In fact, NO ONE carries it, not even the off-the-beaten-path book resellers that lurk in the dark corners of the 'net.

My questions are:
1) With this not being any sort of official standard, why is it referenced so much by manufacturers of concrete sealers?

2) Are the "tests" mentioned in citing this report now existent in the guise of some ASTM or AASHTO standard?
3) Should I just forget about it and delete the reference since I'm not doing a bridge anyway?
Thanks for your insights.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, then you have received this email in error and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of your unintended receipt by reply and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email or as a result of any additions or deletions of information originally contained in this email.