<snip> "Microstation is the de facto standard for
highway and transportation engineering where it doesn't come close anywhere
you saying the Microstation does not have the functionality to "come close
anywhere else" or that it does not have the industry support. Either way,
I beg to differ. We have been users of Intergraph, and now Microstation
for at least 20 years, standardizing on it due to the requirements of our
primary client, the Corps of Engineers and previous clients, the Kentucky
DOT. Many of the CAD users we have hired over the years began with AutoCAD
and after climbing the short learning curve with MicroStation, do not ever wish
to return to having to deal with AutoCAD. Having said that, when we do
have a requirement to provide a client AutoCAD files, it is a real
as the 3D modeling, I don't know anything about Revit but we have been using
Bentley's Triforma Building Information Modeling (BIM) system for a few years
now and I doubt that any AutoCAD products come close to the abilities of
-----Original Message----- From: Polhemus, Bill
[mailto:bill.polhemus(--nospam--at)tyson.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 7:10
PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: RE: Arch. Desktop /
From: Yi Yang [mailto:YI(--nospam--at)summit-sr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:20 PM To:
seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: RE: Arch. Desktop / Revit
Kind of interesting to realize that "PC" software is
finally, just now, getting to the point where integrated design/model packages
like RAND-MICAS or MICASPLUS (on Intergraph CLIX) were back in the late 1980s
on the *nix distributed workstation platform.
This isn't a case of the hardware capability finally
catching up--we've had "PC" hardware and networking capabilities on a par with
those old *nix VAR systems for seven or eight years now.
Rather, it's the case of the SOFTWARE side catching up.
It's probably because the effort involved to come up with CAE systems at this
level just haven't had the profit potential.
"Back in the day" when Intergraph was selling these
large-scale MicroVax-based engineering workstation systems--minicomputer host
systems, networking, graphic CLIX workstations, and training, price of all
that specialized hardware was more than worth the price of admission. And that
price was very large indeed.
A typical medium-sized engineering office could expect
costs approaching one million bucks.
These companies made a killing on the hardware. There was
none of the industry standardization of hardware that we take for granted
today (even in the case of the processors, all but a very few are "compatible"
with the Intel standard). There was a lot of innovation and "we have what the
others don't". And systems like CATIA were VERY much tailored to the
industries in which they were used.
Lots of government money going around--Intergraph got
quite stupidly rich off government & military contracts for their systems,
which were so ubiquitous in that market that to this day Microstation is the
de facto standard for highway and transportation engineering where it doesn't
come close anywhere else.
Anyway, with the kinds of software products that we use
almost become "commodities"--heck, I saw a full copy of Autocad 2006 sitting
ON THE SHELF at Fry's Electronics in Houston--hypothetical developers cannot
charge the confiscatory rates that once were the rule, and so they don't seem
to have the incentive to "port" a lot of these sophisticated CAE systems to
I've been amazed at the capbilities that much of the
software we use DON'T have compared to what we used in the Golden Age of CAE
in the 1980s.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended
addressee, then you have received this email in error and any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. Please notify us immediately of your unintended receipt by reply
and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods, Inc. and its
subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting
from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this
email or as a result of any additions or deletions of information originally
contained in this email.