Yes, I did submit a "public comment" at that time.
William C. Sherman, PE
CDM, Denver, CO
From: Scott Maxwell [mailto:smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: RE: IBC Question
Did you submit a comment to ACI 318-02 when the ADM was proposed to be
removed? For some reason, I seem to recall your name from somewhere
when I was working for ACI. Of course, I am getting old and senile,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Sherman, William wrote:
> You do make a good point that the commentary is not part of the legal
> document, although I do think that the Commentary could be sited as a
> clear indication of the code committee's "intent". I was strongly
> opposed to removal of the Alternate Design Method from ACI 318, and in
> my opinion, all material codes should maintain some basic ASD
> provisions, even if relatively conservative. We should maintain the
> ability to analyze service load stresses and to have a feel for the
> acceptability of the calculated stresses.
> As an ACI 350 committee member, I am also a strong proponent of
> keeping the Alternate Design Method in that code, which is still part
> of the next proposed version (due to be published for public comments
> William C. Sherman, PE
> (Bill Sherman)
> CDM, Denver, CO
> Phone: 303-298-1311
> Fax: 303-293-8236
> email: shermanwc(--nospam--at)cdm.com
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Maxwell [mailto:smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:17 AM
> > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > Subject: RE: IBC Question
> > Ah, but from a technical point of view, section R1.1 is _NOT_ part
> > of ACI
> > 318 (i.e. the "code"). The commentary is NOT a "legal"
> > document...in otherwords, it is not a mandatory language document
> > and has no standing from the point of view of being "code
> > enforceable". Now, it could be construed as a "standard of care"
> > document.
> > The point is that from a purely code/"legal" point of view that bit
> > in the commentary means nothing.
> > Now, if you have a local juridiction that has adopted ACI
> > 350-01 as a referenced code for environmental structures (i.e.
> > tanks, etc), then I believe WSD would still be permitted "per code"
> > as I believe ACI 350 still has WSD (aka the "Alternate Desgin
> > Method"). It is also possible that some of the ACI nuclear oriented
> > codes might still have WSD in them.
> > Thus, that is the reason why I stated "technically, WSD no longer
> > exists for concrete". You forgot my little qualifier (i.e. the
> > "technically").
> > You are correct, however, that the commentary does imply that WSD
> > "may"
> > be used, but as I am not a lawyer (though I have stayed in Holiday
> > Inn Express hotels in the past) I cannot say how much legal validity
> > such a commentary statement has.
> > Regards,
> > Scott
> > Adrian, MI
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Sherman, William wrote:
> > > It is not completely accurate to say that "WSD no longer exists
> > > for concrete" or that a 1/3 increase no longer applies to
> > > Although the Alternate Design Method is no longer published
> > in the ACI
> > > 318 Appendices, Section R1.1 of ACI 318-05 includes the
> > statement "The
> > > Alternate Design Method of the 1999 code may be used in place of
> > > applicable sections of this code." And section A.2.2 of the 1999
> > > Appendix A for the Alternate Design Method permits a 0.75
> > > reduction factor when considering wind or earthquake forces. Thus,
> > > WSD with a
> > > 1/3 allowable stress increase is still permitted - it is
> > just hidden well.
> > >
> > >
> > > William C. Sherman, PE
> > > (Bill Sherman)
> > > CDM, Denver, CO
> > > Phone: 303-298-1311
> > > Fax: 303-293-8236
> > > email: shermanwc(--nospam--at)cdm.com
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********