Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]


[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I am using Enercalc a lot and for many years.  Practically all structural engineers I know use it. 
The program has some glitches - and what program does not?  Even a slide rule sometimes many need adjustment (I remember waxing the slider in mine).  But other than these glitches - which, in my opinion, are really negligible and expeditiously fixed - Enercalc is a great powerful tool that helps thousands of engineers.  I know about several programs that tried to do what Enercalc does - to my knowledge, nobody was as successful as Mike Brooks.
Now, if Mr. Grassley's post would say - such and such module has such and such problems, and Enercalc wouldn't fix them in such and such time - this would be another story.  The reality, however, is quite different (refer to Mike Brooks' post).  Mr. Grassley's post does not contain any facts, just negative and unsubstantiated opinions.  
I cannot come up with any reason why any engineer would write anything like what Mr. Grassley did.  However, we all have our bad days; in this case, a simple apology from Mr. Grassley will make it right.
Professionally, I am quite comfortable with Mike Brooks' program (I checked it manually many times); ethically, I am equally comfortable with his response.
Steve Gordin SE
Irvine CA
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: ENERCALC

On Sep 30, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Michael Brooks wrote:

> If you seriously have questions on any of our calculation module
> please contact us directly rather than saying such things in a public
> forum.
That statement really makes me uncomfortable, even though ENERCALC is
none of my concern. Grassley has a right to express an opinion in this
particular forum because that's what it's for. If someone's had a bad
experience with software I might consider buying, forums like SEAINT
are about the only place left to find out and evaluate the commentary
for ourselves. Contradict him if you like, but if you imagine shop talk
doesn't include a great deal of commentary on the reliability of
engineering software these days, I hope you'll stay tuned.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw(--nospam--at)   | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at:
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********