Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Nova program on World Trade Tower Collapse

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

On Mar 28, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Carter, Charlie wrote:

Since you asked, I've pasted the email with my comments below.
Good piece of work. I read some more of the report and I think I understand the differences and why.

The FEA that went into that report was absolutely mind-boggling. The report, like every piece of FEA work I've ever seen, implied that it was a straight-through, here's what we do, job running, post-process and write it up: a linear thinking job from the word go. But I'd be willing to bet that the back checking and tweaking process for proper convergence, correlation and re-tweaking was highly iterative, very intuitive and required a great deal of engineering insight. I'm seriously impressed.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com   | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********