Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Monday Morning Quiz

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I would say that if the contractor has adequate engineering credentials, he is welcome to try and prove to the building department that there is no reason for him to do the additional work.
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Polhemus, Bill [mailto:BPolhemus(--nospam--at)wje.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:41 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Quiz


From: Bill Allen [mailto:T.W.Allen(--nospam--at)cox.net]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:31 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Quiz

 

Want to know the kicker?

 

These conditions just passed structural inspection today. The client is wondering why I’m making such a big deal about it.

 


 

“You structural engineers overdo everything.”

 

“The contractor tells me he’s been doing it this way for 27 years.”

 

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********