Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: mass vs vibration

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Bill,

Changing the mass changes the natural frequency of the system. Changing the mass in any way whether increasing it or decreasing it could, in theory, move the natural frequency closer to the forced frequency of the loading. This would be moving towards resonance rather than away from it.

Regards,

H. Daryl Richardson

----- Original Message ----- From: <William.Sherman(--nospam--at)CH2M.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: mass vs vibration


Your statement that "mass makes the situation worse, not better" seems
contradictory to the rule of thumb to make the mass of a foundation at
grade several times the mass of vibrating equipment.  Please clarify.


Bill Sherman
CH2M HILL / DEN
720-286-2792

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Wright [mailto:chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 12:20 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Re: big dig structural failure - epoxy anchors overhead
supporting gravity


(it was written somewhere that the ceiling was that heavy to prevent
vibrations)
Whoever wrote that may have been looking for an excuse. Additional mass
does not prevent vibrations. Vibration occurs when you have a mass
supported elastically. More mass reduces the system frequency, but tends
to make the amplitude higher for a given excitation and increases the
dynamic loading. Additional mass makes the situation worse, not better.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com   | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania
1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********