Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: WTC conspiracy theory debunked

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Meaning that you don't want to automatically give the guy that says, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" full faith given that there have been numerous instances of "higher level" non-scientist spin (i.e., revisions) made to materially alter what was originally developed in an more scientifically impartial and scientifically sound manner by government experts.  I don't think Sharon is suggesting who is more credible, just pointing out you need to look behind the report for potential motives and biases, not just blindly accepting the conclusions.
Bill Cain, S.E.
Berkeley CA
In a message dated 9/7/2006 1:34:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jcomfort(--nospam--at) writes:
Meaning the conspiracy theorists and their professional and academic analysts (if they have any) are more credible???
-----Original Message-----
From: Sharon [mailto:sharon(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:18 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: WTC conspiracy theory debunked

I believe that he wants us to consider the source.


Sharon Robertson, P.E.

Arcon Engineers 
5625 Ruffin Rd, Ste 130 
San Diego, CA  92123

858/503-7858 fax

Visit us on the web at

From: Josh Comfort [mailto:jcomfort(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:00 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: WTC conspiracy theory debunked


I don't get your point?

-----Original Message-----
From: ECVAl3(--nospam--at) [mailto:ECVAl3(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 11:42 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: WTC conspiaracy theory debunked

In a message dated 8/30/2006 4:37:42 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, rbengrguy(--nospam--at) writes:

Gee, look who runs the NIST

"NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration."

Who would of thunk it!