Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Slab Transition Detail

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
One more thought comes to mind. You might want to consider concrete pavers. Some heavy equipment manufacturers use pavers in the areas that they repair and service big industrial caterpillars and scrapers. Pavers are very resistant to surface abrasion. And pavers can be repaired relatively easily.

Harold Sprague

From: "Rich Lewis" <seaint04(--nospam--at)>
Reply-To: <seaint(--nospam--at)>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)>
Subject: RE: Slab Transition Detail
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:37:59 -0600

Bob & Harold,

Thanks for the responses.  You asked some good questions.

Right now, I'm stuck with the aluminum wheels.  It's an addition to an
existing industrial facility and the carts are in use.  They tell me the
reason for the aluminum is because the carts are placed in a bake oven and
heavy loads.  I'm not sure why that matters, but when I asked why aluminum,
that's what they told me.  They told me later they had used steel wheels in
the past but the steel wheels chewed up the slab so much they changed to the softer aluminum. I haven't seen them in operation, but apparently they push
these carts around on the floor using a fork lift.  They pick up one side
and roll the other.  The slab surface is chewed up pretty good.  So are the
aluminum wheels.  I'm wondering now if the aluminum is causing the surface
of the concrete to deteriorate even more.

The steel plate is at a steam bath area.  Motor casings are placed on these
carts and one of the processes is steam cleaning. The cart is positioned on
a steel plate over a pit.  One plate is perforated to allow water to drain
into the pit.  There is a plate bolted to the slab in front and behind the
pit as an approach to pit.  The 3 plates are approximately 5 ft. x 10 ft.
Right now the approach plate sits on top of the slab and there is a bump as
it rolls.  Originally the pit area did not have approach plates.  The
approach plates were added because the concrete slab was chewed up really
bad in front and behind the pit.

The first thought was to repeat the design in the new addition. I was going
to have the plate flush with the top of slab.  I don't think it is possible
to float a plate that big during a pouring operation of the slab without
getting voids under it.  The plate needs to be installed after the slab is
placed.  The constant moisture would eliminate any wood planking

I'm now thinking that the extra approach steel plates probably should not be
required if the concrete was designed adequately around the pit, and there
was a good armor joint like Harold suggested.  I looked at the PNA armor
joint, and one by Kalman.  I'm thinking the slab surface should slope
towards the pit and have an armor edge around it.  The top surface of the
plate over the pit would match the armor edge of the concrete. The concrete
should have a dry shake surface hardener.  I'm a little hesitant about this
though since they have experienced problems with the slab around the pit in
the past. Although, it was never designed for that kind of use in mind when
the original slab was poured.

Any other suggestions for this design would be appreciated.




From: Robert Kazanjy [mailto:rkazanjy(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:09 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: Slab Transition Detail

I assume you're stuck with the aluminum wheels?

What are the wheel loads?   Frequency of travel?

This could be a real problem......I know of situation where a slab was
designed for "forklift traffic".

Unfortunately the designer thought "pneumatic tires" but these were little
warehouse forks with rubber over steel wheels....add to this some slab curl
at construction joints and you wound up with forks destroying the slab at
these joints   :(

You are wise to think about this now but with more details I really can't
provide much help.

If the carts / wheels need a steel wear surface, why are they ever leaving
the steel?

Any imperfections will be magnified as the load pounds the
transition......compliant materials are your friend but the load has to get
onto the concrete eventually.

Maybe design it with maint / replacement in mind?  Like the rubber stuff at
street / railroad intersections?

CalTrans' info about bridge joints might be of some use.

>>> Would chamfering the edge of the plate help at all?<<<<,

Yes but again you're transitioning from a damage tolerant, strong, ductile
material to concrete (all its not)

I'd warn them that stiff metal wheels are going to be hard on the concrete
at the transitions.


On 3/1/07, Rich Lewis <seaint04(--nospam--at)> wrote:

I have a condition where a steel plate will be embedded in a concrete slab.
The plate will be about 1/2" thick and provide a hard wearing surface for
solid aluminum wheels on a cart hauling heavy equipment. The dimensions are
10 ft. x 4 ft.

I am wondering about the edge condition of the plate and concrete.  The
wheels will roll over the edge from concrete to steel. Should this be given
special consideration?  Would there be a tendency of the concrete to spall
around the edge? Should a joint be put around the edge and filled with semi
rigid epoxy filler? Would that still tend to spall from the wheel load?
Would chamfering the edge of the plate help at all?

Thanks for your help.


Mortgage rates as low as 4.625% - Refinance $150,000 loan for $579 a month. Intro*Terms

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********