Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: quality of works

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Daryl Richardson wrote:

It's not uncommon, in contracts that I have had knowledge of (including government contracts), for the Owner to have the option of accepting work that did not meet specification in consideration for a reduction in contract price. But never at the expense of safety! Never!!!

That occurred to me because I've spent a lot of time buying stuff off. But it's only when money moves into the picture that I get suspicious. I don't do buildings, so I don't deal with architectural/ cosmetic issues much, although I'll buy off the odd scratch or dent from time to time, but almost never in trade for cash. In fact, I couldn't tell what kinds of non-conformities were at issue either, but the trade-off really raised a flag with me.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com   | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********