Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: ASCE 7-05 Errors

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Maybe instead of trying to revise ASCE7 (as well as the other codes) so often, maybe they ought to take the additional time required to review it better.


Jim Sherman, P.E.


From: Jordan Truesdell, PE [mailto:seaint1(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 6:38 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: ASCE 7-05 Errors


Maybe that's part of the problem :-o


Scott Maxwell wrote:

... I will further note that 24 pages is not that bad
considering that ASCE 7-05 is about 400 pages long.  ...
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********