Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: was excavation

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

And columns were columes.


From: David Fisher [mailto:dfisher(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:47 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: was excavation


When I was working for SOM in the 80s, we had a French “designer” who referred to EVERY structural

Member (beam, column, slab, brace) as a (imagine said with a French accent al a Monty Python) “girder beam”




David L. Fisher SE PE

Senior Director


Cape Cod Grand Cayman Holdings Ltd. - Cayman

Fisher+Partners Structural Engineers Ltd. - Cayman

372 West Ontario Chicago 60610

75 Fort Street Georgetown Grand Cayman BWI

319 A Street Boston 02210




312.573.1726 facsimile

312.622.0409 mobile





From: David Topete [mailto:dtopete(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:38 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: was excavation


Stucker?  That’s a new one.  “Masonary” is about as common as “cement.”  I tend to correct people with some of those terms…


David A. Topete, SE


From: Bob Freeman [mailto:robert.freeman(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:33 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: was excavation




Have you heard of stucker?!  How about masonary?


Bob Freeman


Structural Designer


The information contained in the e-Mail, including any accompanying documents or attachments, is from Moffatt & Nichol and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us.