Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: flagpole foundation

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

I'll be the first to admit that I am not 100% positive about this, but I believe that the UBC flagpole equation assumes rigid pile action.  This is defined as the soil strength being the controlling factor and that the pile strength and flexibility do not greatly effect the result.  I've seen various limits placed on this, such as the total embedment must be less than pile diameter/10 or something similar.  Your 46 foot embed is just outside that, but with the high shear and moment load you have, you might want to look at one of the flexible pile solutions.  Software programs such as LPILE or COM 624 can solve these problems, assuming you understand the input parameters well enough to properly use the program.  Manual solutions are presented in NAVFAC DM-7.2, which is available on line.

--Kipp Martin
  Carollo Engineers
  Portland, Oregon

>>> <PFFEI(--nospam--at)> 8/15/2007 6:56 AM >>>
does the flagpole foundation formula for non constrained conditions (1997  
ubc, 1806.8.2.1, eq. 6-1) have a limiting conditions regarding loading or  
embedment?  does this apply fro high loadings resulting in deep  embedments?  i 
have a condition with a 170K load at 4' above the ground  surface resulting in 
46' embedment.  
thanks- paul franceschi

************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********