Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: UBC 1997[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: UBC 1997
- From: "Mark Deardorff" <mark(--nospam--at)rstavares.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:24:09 -0700
Mark E. Deardorff, SE
R & S Tavares Associates, Inc
This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain confidential and proprietary information and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected by law. It may be read and used solely by the intended recipient(s), and any review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this e-mail, including any attachments, from your system immediately without reading, copying or distributing them. Thank you for your cooperation. R&S Tavares Associates Inc. and its client retain all proprietary rights they may have in the information.
There are frequent references to UBC 1997 in this list. As old as that code is, does it continue to be allowed by the permitting agencies? Considering that the methodologies to calculate wind and seismic loading have changed significantly, why has UBC 1997 not become defunct?
From: Padmanabhan Rajendran [mailto:rakamaka(--nospam--at)yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:05 AM
Subject: UBC 1997
Do ISO 9002 certified institutions still use UBC 1997?
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
- UBC 1997
- From: Padmanabhan Rajendran
- UBC 1997
- Prev by Subject: Re: UBC 1997
- Next by Subject: Re: UBC 1997
- Previous by thread: Re: UBC 1997
- Next by thread: Re: UBC 1997