Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: Seismic PE Review[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: smaxwell(--nospam--at)umich.edu, seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: Seismic PE Review
- From: Rhkratzse(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:39:13 EDT
Thanks, Scott, good to hear the other side of the story.
In a message dated 8/19/07 9:30:58 PM, smaxwell(--nospam--at)umich.edu writes:
Oh, I dunno...the basic principles are the same...it is just the specifics of figuring out the seismic load coefficient to some degree (OK, so I am rather over simplifying to a large degree). Point is that it is what is in force and what those EITs have been using for the past 2 or more years while getting their experience. Personally, if I were in their shoes, I would prefer to take it with the UBC as I would be MUCH more familiar with it than the IBC if I were practicing in California. As a case in point, when I re-took the Struct III exam in Washington, they had just adopted a version of the IBC, but you could still choose to use the 1997 UBC when taking the Struct III test if you wanted. I choose to use the UBC rather than the IBC because I was more familiar with it. Similarly, when I took the Struct II in Illinois years ago, I had the choice between the BOCA code and the UBC. I choose to use the BOCA code at that time because I was more familiar with it than the UBC.
From: Rhkratzse(--nospam--at)aol.com [mailto:Rhkratzse(--nospam--at)aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Seismic PE Review
What's wrong with this picture?
Isn't the UBC dying in less than six months?
I suppose they're using the UBC because the test is based on the UBC.
It must be frustrating to have to study and be tested on a dying code, knowing you'll have to learn a new one the next month.
Again, what's wrong with this picture?
Ralph Kratz, S.E.
Richmond CA USA
In a message dated 8/19/07 3:36:57 PM, listmaster(--nospam--at)mail.asce-sf.org writes:
SEISMIC PRINCIPLES SEMINAR
This course will provide a review of the basic principles of seismic design of structures for the California Professional Civil Engineer License Examination. The seminar registration fee includes four full days of instruction, course materials complete with example problems, and course participants experience a high (>85%) pass rate.
This course will be held on the following dates: SEPTEMBER 22, 29 and OCTOBER 6, 13 (4 Saturdays)
Time: 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Location: 1000 Broadway, Suite 109, Oakland, CA 94607
Effects of earthquakes on structures; Introduction to UBC Earthquake Design Requirements; Generation of seismic forces; Base shear distribution; Load paths and transmission of loads through the structure; Analysis and design of small building structures with flexible diaphragms; Wall rigidities / Rigid diaphragms; Single degree of freedom oscillators / response spectrum; Practice problems end examples; Review of selected topics; Questions and final clarifications.
EARLY registration is highly recommended. The Registration deadline is September 21, 2007. Enrollment is limited due to classroom size, so register now to secure a seat. All registrations are on a first-come, first-served basis.
$300 - ASCE Member Price
$350 - Non-ASCE Member Price
Visit our website to complete the registration form: http://www.asce-ymf.org/sf
To unsubscribe from this list visit http://www.asce-sf.org/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=171645e62ebdac00493ec0494ec140c6
To update your preferences visit http://www.asce-sf.org/lists/?p=preferences&uid=171645e62ebdac00493ec0494ec140c6
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
- Prev by Subject: RE: Seismic PE Review
- Next by Subject: Seminars (was Wood Design)
- Previous by thread: RE: Seismic PE Review
- Next by thread: re:glu-lam shrinkage