Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Job Opportunity - OT

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Yes, it's typical, both large and small companies...

except at a certain firm in Dallas, TX :-) I think Wilford Brimly is their security guy "he gets paid to be suspicious when there is nothing to be suspicious about"

ok...enough kidding around..

Fees need to go up, plain and simple. We should be billing licensed PE at or above 200 an hour at least, but we don't because there are SE's here in the bay area billing 120...drags us all down.


On 8/23/07, erik gibbs <erik.gibbs(--nospam--at)> wrote:
I graduated about 2 years ago and since then I have worked for 2 different small structural firms. The 1st did not allow overtime with OT pay and the current one no OT pay either, but it feels like I am expected to work OT anyway. Now I do not feel like I should be handed a great job on a silver platter, but my girlfriend who went to a tech school, and is a surgical tech makes more then I do, and she also gets OT pay, great benifits and a lot of time off.
It makes me mad that I busted my ass in college and this is what I see happening. Although I do work in a small company, I am wondering if this is typical of small structural eng firms?  

On 8/23/07, Jerry Coombs <JCoombs(--nospam--at) > wrote:
I have had the dubious opportunity to work for many more companies than I'd like to admit, greatly because of the "revolving door" approach to human resources, and fierce competionion undercutting put some of them out of business.
Hands down, the greater share of those, and of the places my colleagues work, require 45-50 hours of work with no overtime pay, and no comp-time.  As stated by someone else, the "budgets" were too low and the unpaid OT was an expected way to manage them.  All of this with less compensation than most other disciplines, no or minimal bonus.  Average hourly rate easily dipped below that of a Sr. tech working the same hours w/ 1.5 OT.
50 hours is reasonable?  Not on a general basis.  Add an hour for lunch and an hour travel time, that gave me time to give my kid a hug before I left, eat dinner with him and see him to bed. 
After nearly 30 years, I finally work for a stable company that values its employees.  It's not a structural firm.

>>> "Michel Blangy" < mblangy(--nospam--at)> 8/22/2007 3:18 PM >>>
I worked for a firm where jobs routinely went over budget. Therefore, time spent beyond 40 hours a week was not considered OT, but rewarded to employees as "comp-time." Unfortunately, we were so busy trying to make deadlines on subsequent jobs that there never seemed time to use it. "Sweat-shop" would be a nicely-worded way of describing that place.

Michel Blangy, P.E.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wesley Werner [mailto: wwerner(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:14 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: RE: Job Opportunity

From: Bill Polhemus [mailto:bill(--nospam--at) ]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:19 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: Job Opportunity

Wesley Werner wrote:
    The company offers a good work environment with a quick pace. Hard work is well rewarded with pay raises and bonuses tied to performance.
Wesley, be honest.

This is a nicely-worded way of saying "sweat-shop," isn't it?
[Wesley Werner] No. Everyone is paid hourly. Any extra time you work is overtime pay. I typically work 45-50 hrs which I think is a reasonable work week. One of the main purposes of hiring a new engineer is to get someone that can devote uninterrupted time to design. More and more, I am fielding questions from other employees (steel detailers, field workers, etc.), and don't have the time to get a lot of design done. When questions do arise, usually the answer is needed quickly hence my comment about the quick pace.

Not that there's anything wrong with that; it seems that more and more "specialty design-build" firms of which I'm aware are "sweat-shops" these days. It's a good place for a kid just out of school to get his baptism of fire, but you also get a large turnover and a small but significant number of "burnouts" who quit engineering altogether to go into real estate (or worse, to law school), etc.

Just sayin'.
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********