Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: California Building Code and the 2006 IBC

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Andre,

I am not that familiar with Los Angeles Building Code but by state law they will have to use the 2007 California Building Code which is based on the 2006 IBC.  As with all the local municipalities they were given 6 month to prepare their amendments and I was told (but have not confirmed) that they have already made available their new LA Building Code amendments.  It is not likely there will be any grace period since they would be in jeopardy of violating state law.

Thomas Hunt, S.E.
Fluor



Andre Sidler <asidler(--nospam--at)hotmail.com>
11/06/2007 02:21 PM
Please respond to seaint
To
<seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
cc
Subject
California Building Code and the 2006 IBC





Fellow Listers -

I hear California is adopting the IBC in January, 2008. Does any one have an idea on what the code status is for the city of Los Angeles? Will they also be adopting in January, 2008? Will there be any grace period where you can submit under either IBC or UBC(CBC 2001)? Will they have amendments? Um, sorry, the questions should have been, "how many amendments?"

I tried calling the LA Call Center and I didn't get any help.

Thanks,

Andre J. Sidler, P.E., S.E.
Quantum Consulting Engineers
Seattle, WA

------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.  
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are 
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon 
this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.  
------------------------------------------------------------