Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Cantilevered Retaining Wall - Footings are Definately Too Big

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Yes, you are correct. With soft soils, you just can't hold much earth back. And that makes logical sense, too.  Now, that presumes you're analyzing it as a retaining wall with a spread footing. Why not consider it like a sheet pile and ignore the footing and see how far you get? I'm not saying you'll end up better off - I don't do sheet piles, so I don't have a good feel for them - but it's another avenue to pursue.  Also, you might consider micropiles under the footings.
Jordan


Michel wrote:
Thank you all for the input on proportioning. However, my confusion persists.
 
There seems to be a practical limit on retained soil ht. when constrained to 1,000 psf max. allow. soil bearing press. My restrained ht. is about 8'. I just wanted to verify this.
 
-Michel
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********