Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Glass guardrail support

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
To what regime did you test them? 
 
Thor
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Harold Sprague [mailto:spraguehope(--nospam--at)hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 2:40 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Glass guardrail support

Back in years gone by we simply required the guard rails to be tested after they were installed.  I was amazed how much glass could bend, but they performed well, and I slept well. 

Regards,
Harold Sprague



Subject: RE: Glass guardrail support
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:16:47 -0500
From: gloomis(--nospam--at)MasterEngineersinc.com
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org

Yes, if the conditions are right.  See Metal Stairs Manual AMP 510 by the National Association of Architectural Metal Manufacturers.  They provide tables for load distribution for uniform and concentrated loads.  But there are conditions that must be met. 

 

Gary W. Loomis, P.E., Senior Structural Engineering

Master Engineers and Designers, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thor Tandy [mailto:vicpeng(--nospam--at)telus.net]
Sent
: Friday, January 04, 2008 4:46 PM
To:
seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Glass guardrail support

 

We are having a (local) debate on guardrails (any rail system above a drop of 2' or more).  The main concern at this time is that a lot of off-the-shelf railing systems don't appear to conform to the code loadings we have.  Aluminum systems are especially a problem since some manufacturers use the 6063 alloy which doesn't have adequate strength for our loads.  We need at least 6061alloy for posts and connecting plates.  Welding kicks the s... out of any connections too.

 

FWIW our loadings are 1.0kN (225#) point and distributed 0.75kN/m (51.4#/ft).  This means that to minimize the post load the spacing has to be about 4'-4" ... and the (true) design hgt will depend where the fixing is.  If you use a side connect your lever arm could increase to over 3'-9" ...

 

With glass railings we have a requirement that a top rail be in place so that if any one lite is removed/damaged there is still (possible) restraint.  The use of laminated glazing seems to be a way around that requirement but I haven't yet seen where that is allowed per se in our code.

 

My point?  If you are being asked to design just the base connect, make sure that the supplier's system has a written assurance by an/their engineer.  If you just do the base you may not be free of liability that the (overall) system conforms (CYA) to any code ... engineers are meant to know better ...

 

Thor A. Tandy P.Eng, MIStructE, Struct.Eng
Victoria, BC
Canada
vicpeng(--nospam--at)telus.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph R. Grill [mailto:jrgrill(--nospam--at)cableone.net]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:02 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Glass guardrail support

I am looking at the support system for a guard rail system.  The system is pre-manufactured and only the attachment to the structure needs to be designed.  It is a guard in a residence and I am told will be 36" high.  I also understand that per IBC 1607.1 that I only need to consider the 200# load requirement.  The glass panels are wide (from what I am told, they are the full width of the opening they serve with no intermediate vertical non-glass members.

 

I am wondering if there is some distribution of the 200# concentrated load that can be taken from the top of the guard to the support attachment?  with a 36" high guard can the 200# load be distributed over, say 3 ft? or maybe something other 2ft?, 6ft?  A distribution would make my attachment to the substructure much easier since it is a wood substructure.

 

Thanks,

Joe Grill

�


Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. Get it now!