Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Another Seismic Design Example CsubD

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
My copy has CD = 1.6 on the lower part of page 33. Maybe you have an older version and that has been corrected.
Stephen Macie, P.E.
In a message dated 2/18/2008 9:09:14 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, jason(--nospam--at) writes:

Does anyone know why in the “2006 IBD Structural/Seismic Design Manual Vol. 2” same problem as earlier stated, see below, the duration of load, CD­, was used as 1.33 instead of the 1.6 that the NDS allows?






From: ECVAl3(--nospam--at) [mailto:ECVAl3(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:24 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Seismic Design Example


For those of you that have and understand the "2006 IBC Structural/Seismic Design Manual Vol.2" I have a question.

On page 32 to determine the Anchorage at A on a perforated shear wall:

Going from the formula  (0.9-0.2*SDS)*D + Wo*QE

Wo = 3.0,   SDS = 1.19

they suddenly go to the formula  (0.9-0.2*SDS)*D + Wo*E

Putting the numerical values in they get  (0.9-0.2*1.19)*D + 0.66*D


My question is, how did they get 0.66*D from Wo*QE or Wo*E  ?

Can anyone shed some light on this for me?


Thank you,


The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. AOL Music takes you there.

Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living.