Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Alternate Wind Provision

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Joe, and Ben,

 

I do agree with you.  The presenter does state: “…wind loads are transmitted through rigid floor and roof diaphragms”. His criteria wasn’t the need for a “rigid”  building and I agree they are not the same.  I’m not sure why he made the statement that the loads had to be transmitted through rigid floor and roof diaphragms.  I dug out my copy of the slides to make sure and that is what he states.

 

All in all it was a pretty good, but short, seminar.

 

Joe

 

From: Jnapd(--nospam--at)aol.com [mailto:Jnapd(--nospam--at)aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 1:43 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Re: Alternate Wind Provision

 

Joe

 

I disagree with the instructor of that class.  A typical residence at 30 tall.   Ta = .02 x 30^.75 = .25 sec

 

                                                                                                               f= 1/.25  = 4 hz

                                                                                                   therefore Rigid per definitionin ASCE-07

 

Rigid for Wind and Rigid roof and floor Diaphragms are totally different and he is probably confusing the issue.

 

Joe Venuti
Johnson & Nielsen Associates
Palm Springs, CA




Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos.