Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: SMF connection

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Must be for bolted SMF?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tarek Mokhtar [mailto:Tarekmokhtar(--nospam--at)earthlink.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:25 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: SMF connection

At the roof level of a multistory SMF, The City of L.A quality assurance
plans shows the top of the column to be three inches higher than the top
of the beam framing into it, and I can not find that in the seismic
provisions, anybody know the reason for those extra 3" and whether they
are required or merely recommended?

Thanx in advance
--
Tarek Mokhtar, SE
Laguna Beach, Ca






******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** 

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********