Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Flexure vs. Cable Action in a solid rod.

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

I have used the cable concept for the “top rail” of a glass residential guard rail and the concept is correct provided it behaves as intended: to restrain a design load at any point along it.


I think your EOR might still be in the box.  Your end welds might be subject to fatigue … ?  Pinned end connections might be better.


Thor A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE
Victoria, BC



From: Michael Gregory [mailto:tsemike(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:02 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Flexure vs. Cable Action in a solid rod.


A contractor has used a ½” diameter solid rod (50 ksi) for railing on a bicycle bridge.  The railing spans 6’-0” and has about a 4” fillet weld at each end attaching it to the vertical uprights which are heavy HSS sections.  The specifications required the rod to carry a 50 plf horizontal and vertical load simultaneously.  Using standard flexure equations, it fails.  However, it appears to act as a cable in that it only delfects about ½” with a 500 lbs point load (2 big guys standing on it). 


I performed cable calculations showing that it works since it appears to act as a cable.  The EOR has rejected my calculations as “a leap of faith” and contends since the element is a sold rod, it has to act as a bending member and be analzyed using standard flexure calculations and cannot be reasonably analyzed as a cable.  Specifically he has asked to show something from an “industry standard” that shows exactly where it stops acting as a beam and starts acting as a cable.  As he pointed out, if the rod were only 6” long, it would definitely act as a beam – I agree.  But if the rod were 20’ long and fixed at both ends, it would most certainly act as a cable, which he agreed. 


My calculations are based on the book Cable Structures by Max Irvine which was copyrighted by MIT in 1981.  I am confident that my calculations and assumptions are correct but I’m dealing with a Civil Engineering firm and the EOR admits that he doesn’t know anything about cable calculations (he asked me to send him my book).    The research I’ve done indicates that there is not an exact point at which an element quits acting as a flexural element and begins behaving as a cable element.


Any help?  Is there someone or some other reference that I can turn to?  I have searched the internet and have not turned up any good leads.  Is there any software available that will analyze a catenary shaped member?  Are there any references, research papers or other documents that indicates at what point a solid element may begin to behave as a cable?  Thanks!!


Michael Gregory, PE


208-357-2420 Office

208-357-2419 Fax