Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Historical Yield Stress

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


It has been 36 ksi yield since the early 1960's.  For a detailed listing of historical steel refer to AISC Steel Design Guide 15, "AISC Rehabilitation and Retrofit Guide".

Thomas Hunt, S.E.

Richard Calvert <RichardC(--nospam--at)>
02/25/2010 03:07 PM
Please respond to seaint
"seaint(--nospam--at)" <seaint(--nospam--at)>
Historical Yield Stress

I’m working on a build out of an older structure.  There is no information, plans, permits, etc on the original construction, or any of the retrofit work contained in the building…….
I’ve pegged some of the member sizes to ASD Ed. 7 as the last printing that contained their sizes, and one of the members had a W18x60 shop mark, which excludes the possibility of previous editions – as the appropriate designation would have been WF18x7.5 for ASD6
This puts the construction between 1970 and 1980 (maybe 1985 considering many engineers don’t readily update their steel manuals)
With that, I am curious if there were common grades used other/lower than 36ksi for wide flange beams during this period?  And am I correct that the use of 50ksi steel was rare during this period (is 36ksi a safe/conservative assumption)?
Thank you,
Richard Calvert, EIT
Project Engineer
Lindemann Bentzon Bojack
Architects & Engineers
290 Citrus Tower Blvd, Suite 200, Clermont, Fl. 34711
tel: 352.242.0100 ext.141 fax: 352.242.0302
Proudly Serving America's Top Builders
Internet Email Confidentiality
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.

If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if
you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of
this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood
as neither given nor endorsed by it.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.  
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are 
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon 
this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.