Need a book?
Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index:
Re: WTC collapses
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: WTC collapses
- From: "John H. Cato, jr. R.A." <jcato(--nospam--at)accessatc.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:58:05 -0400
John H. Cato, jr, R.A.
On 8/20/2011 2:41 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:
I may, I would like a copy too.
A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE
would like a copy. I take it that you disagree with the
NIST report. http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
Regards, Harold Sprague
Subject: WTC collapses
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:33:44 +1000
far as Building 7 collapse, there is no better
explanation than controlled demolition
can question the qualification of the presenter, but
this does not undermine the above statement.
for the towers themselves, mechanical damage plus
subsequent action of fire
have done it. (Don't forget the oxygen content of the
plane, which makes a furnace
of the area.) But there is a problem. No way to
explain, on structural grounds,
it collapsed as fast as it did.
the rational side: as far as sounds of explosions are
concerned, there is less of mysteries
often implied by various writers.
paper on the subject is about to be published.
you let me know, I will send you a pre-print version.