Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: WTC collapses[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Re: WTC collapses
- From: Randall Moore <ranmoo(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 08:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: WTC collapses
From: John H. Cato, jr. R.A. [mailto:jcato(--nospam--at)accessatc.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: WTC collapsesSame here.
John H. Cato, jr, R.A.
On 8/20/2011 2:41 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:If I may, I would like a copy too.ThanksThor A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE
CanadaI would like a copy. I take it that you disagree with the NIST report. http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
Regards, Harold Sprague
Subject: WTC collapses
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:33:44 +1000As far as Building 7 collapse, there is no better explanation than controlled demolitionYou can question the qualification of the presenter, but this does not undermine the above statement.As for the towers themselves, mechanical damage plus subsequent action of firecould have done it. (Don't forget the oxygen content of the plane, which makes a furnaceout of the area.) But there is a problem. No way to explain, on structural grounds,why it collapsed as fast as it did.On the rational side: as far as sounds of explosions are concerned, there is less of mysteriesthan often implied by various writers.My paper on the subject is about to be published.If you let me know, I will send you a pre-print version.Gregory from Oz
- Prev by Subject: RE: WTC collapses
- Next by Subject: RE: WTC collapses
- Previous by thread: RE: WTC collapses
- Next by thread: RE: WTC collapses