Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: Buoyancy factor of safety[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint-seaosc(--nospam--at)mail-list.com
- Subject: Re: Buoyancy factor of safety
- From: "h.d.richardson" <h.d.richardson(--nospam--at)telus.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:03:00 -0700
- List-subscribe: <mailto:SEAINT-SEAOSCfirstname.lastname@example.org>
Tarek,Whenever I've done these I've assumed the groundwater table for buoyancy calculations was at the surface due to rain saturating the backfill. I've also considered only the soil directly above the submerged tank (or footing extension for concrete cisterns); I've not considered the soil sloping away from the tank wall at 60 degrees or anything like that. I also consider the buoyancy acting on the concrete weights or the footing.
For safety factors (I prefer to call them ignorance factors) Canadian limit states codes would use 1.25 for the dead load (or other accurately determined load) being the force to be resisted and 0.85 for dead weights resisting the force. This results in 1.25/0.85 = 1.47, which is close to 1.5. I would not consider anything less than 1.5.
Regards, H. Daryl Richardson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Hawe" <chawe(--nospam--at)norwestcorp.com> To: <seaint-seaosc(--nospam--at)mail-list.com> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 11:48 AM Subject: RE: [SEAINT-SEAOSC] Buoyancy factor of safety
For sliding and OTM it is typical to use 1.5 with wind and seismic included. I would suggest at least 2. How sure are you (or the geotech) of the water table? If you're not sure maybe more. Craig Hawe, PE, P.ENG. -----Original Message----- From: seaint-seaosc(--nospam--at)mail-list.com [mailto:seaint-seaosc(--nospam--at)mail-list.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Mokhtar Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 11:40 AM To: seaint-seaosc(--nospam--at)mail-list.com Subject: [SEAINT-SEAOSC] Buoyancy factor of safety What would an appropriate factor of safety against floatation of asubmerged residential basement be? would AISC load combination 6 ( 0.6D +H ) be applicable in this situation?-- Tarek Mokhtar, SE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Post your message to the list by sending it to: SEAINT-SEAOSC(--nospam--at)mail-list.com.
The email messages sent to the list will be saved in an archive on the World Wide Web. These archives are located at: http://archive.mail-list.com/SEAINT-SEAOSC To contact the list owner, send your message to: SEAINT-SEAOSC-list-owner(--nospam--at)mail-list.com. 5700 Ralston Street, Suite 300, Ventura, CA 93003 To unsubscribe, switch to/from digest, get on/off vacation, or change your email address, click here. http://cgi.mail-list.com/u?ln=seaint-seaosc&nm=seaintma%40euken.net
- Prev by Subject: RE: Buoyancy factor of safety
- Next by Subject: Re: Buoyancy factor of safety
- Previous by thread: RE: Buoyancy factor of safety
- Next by thread: Re: Buoyancy factor of safety