Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Poll: Software

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I agree with you and we can go on and on. Sometimes they are trying to wear us out. But the sequence could be:
1.    Good complete submittal - turn around one or two weeks.
2.    Poor submittal - numerous turn arounds - one month to six months.
3. Awful submittal - never approved and sometimes the manufacturer hauls away his unit and the customer (my client) has to start over.


On 2/17/2014 1:57 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:
My $0.02 worth.

FWIW pages of output etc are soakers of time unless one is looking for
specific information but even then, IMO, the submitter should either be
summarizing the critical results with associated input parameters or
providing the (relevant) output for referencing to the details ...?

Pages of computer fluff are often a sign of laziness, avoiding
responsibility for the exercise and/or trying to impress the Client ... uh oh ... talking about myself again ...

As I suggest above, unless I required the output for my own design
checking, I would request only those salient results that can be used for
further design steps.

But, it's true, I often get these outputs when I'm reviewing specialty
engineered components like trusses, and also when I request design data
from suppliers for proprietary items ... the impression is they don't know what they are giving: just blinding me with science.

Truncated 1142 characters in the previous message to save energy.


Post your message to the list by sending it to: SEAINT-SEAOSC(--nospam--at)

The email messages sent to the list will be saved in an archive on the World Wide Web.
These archives are located at:

To contact the list owner, send your message to:

Sponsored By: Pacific Structural & Forensic Engineers Group, Inc. (PSFEG)

To unsubscribe, switch to/from digest, get on/off vacation, or change your email address, click here.