Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Conversion to Metrics

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
What is hard about metric is keeping track of all those long numbers where your unit of measurement is based on millimetres and then metres for other items. It really screwed me up once - took an hour to find the mistake of 1 extra zero. Another engineer employed me to check his work when he failed to pass an exam that Ontario imposed on all engineers, architects and draftsmen for code knowledge. He did his calcs in metric and there were several mistakes; he was older than me. Anyway the engineers and archies sued the Ont. government and won and the requirement for these tests was tossed.

On 3/20/2015 7:29 AM, Alex Nacionales wrote:

I agree with your Pros and Cons of metrication but please explain how
base12 is better
than base 10 in shipping and packaging. It is hard to count with your
knuckles(base 14).
I do not think you need your hand to count just your head but your hand can help you to pray.
Base 2 is good  in computer programming and binary math.
Computer programming is my hobby eversince my Aunt gave me my
first programmable HP calculator when I was in college.
I like how you can run a program and debug it until it is perfect.
Structural Engineering is more complex.


Alex Nacionales

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Lloyd Pack, P.E. <
lloyd(--nospam--at)> wrote:

Truncated 661 characters in the previous message to save energy.

Post your message to the list by sending it to: SEAINT-SEAOSC(--nospam--at)

The email messages sent to the list will be saved in an archive on the World Wide Web.
These archives are located at:

To contact the list owner, send your message to:

Sponsored By: Pacific Structural & Forensic Engineers Group, Inc. (PSFEG)

To unsubscribe, switch to/from digest, get on/off vacation, or change your email address, click here.